In a 2023 FPM account, Halstater and Kuntz describe a family-medicine practice where every patient message initially went to a clinician.
Hello Patient builds AI agents for healthcare. Our agents answer incoming patient questions using approved practice information, including hours, locations, and policies. Clinical decisions stay with the clinical team.
Before changing your routing, follow a sample of requests through to the final answer. A message arriving in the right inbox still needs someone to finish it.
What does the existing inbox research tell you?
Holmgren and colleagues' 2025 study in JAMA Internal Medicine examined Epic Signal data covering 280,712 unique US ambulatory physicians from June 2019 through March 2022. Advice messages remained elevated, while phone messages returned to earlier levels. The study did not assess message contents or burnout. It provides no measured administrative share or effect of AI.
In the FPM account, a multidisciplinary team surveyed clinicians' preferences and assigned message types to pools. RNs reviewed the general pool because those messages could contain clinical questions. Those choices describe that practice's experience. Your clinical lead needs to approve your own rules, including how staff handle uncertainty.
Start with one message from first contact to final answer
Define your sample and a date to check its outcomes. Choose the site, incoming channel, and period, and record any exclusions. Keep the selection consistent for a later comparison.
For example, a hypothetical review could cover one location's patient-message channel for one working week, with outcomes checked the following Friday. Choose a window that suits your practice.
For each request, identify what would show that the patient received the answer or the administrative task was completed under your rules. Trace the record from first contact, including transfers, missing information, and repeat contacts.
Record these fields in a practice-approved review tool.
| Review field | Entry |
|---|---|
| Request review ID | |
| Period / site / channel | |
| First recipient | |
| Intended owner under approved rules | |
| Missing information | |
| Transfers | |
| Repeat contact | |
| Completion evidence and date | |
| Open status at review date |
Use “unknown” when the record does not show the outcome. Keep open requests open in the results. Your review deadline does not create a resolution for the patient.
Which questions can your team answer from approved practice information?
Start with questions whose answers your practice has approved and whose administrative completion can be checked. Read the full request. An appointment reason or a few keywords cannot establish that a message is safely administrative.
This proposed template is not patient data or a clinical protocol. Have your clinical lead approve the owners, boundaries, and escalation destinations before use. Replace generic team names with actual destinations.
| Question | Information needed | Owner | Safe administrative completion | Escalation destination |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Where is my appointment? | Verified appointment location and approved address or arrival instructions | Scheduling team | Give the confirmed location using the approved process | Scheduling lead for conflicting records; clinical team for clinical concerns |
| Can I move my appointment? | Verified appointment, available options, and approved scheduling rules | Scheduling team | Complete and confirm a change permitted by those rules | Scheduling lead for rule exceptions; clinical team when clinical judgment is needed |
| What happens next with my form? | Form type, documented status, and approved process | Designated forms team | Explain the process or relay a verified administrative status | Forms owner for missing status; clinical team for clinical content or sign-off |
| I have several questions, or the request is unclear | Full request and the information needed under approved review rules | Designated review team | Record the request and identify the approved next step; keep unanswered parts open | Clinical review destination when clinical content is present or uncertain |
If the directory says “send to nursing,” identify the pool and its fallback. Detailed prescription refill requests need their own approved handling; this table does not define refill eligibility or clinical decisions.
What context should travel with the handoff?
Send the patient's actual question, what has been answered or done, what remains unanswered, and why the receiving team needs to act. Keep patient information inside approved systems and follow your practice's identification and access rules.
Consider a hypothetical caller who asks for an appointment address and also raises a clinical concern. The address can be confirmed under the practice's rules. The clinical concern still needs its approved destination, with a record that only the location question was answered. Closing the whole request would hide the unfinished part.
Our agents pass context from the incoming conversation to the team your practice selects.
How do you count the work after a message is forwarded?
Count patient requests separately from message threads. Link contacts about the same request using a review ID so you can see repeated effort without counting it as fresh demand each time. Keep the thread and contact counts alongside the request count.
Record who handled each request, how often it moved, whether the patient contacted you again, and whether there is completion evidence by the review date. Report completed, open, and unknown outcomes separately.
If unanswered calls are also part of the picture, review phone capacity alongside this sample without combining the two measures.
Choose one routing change to test
Choose one recurring question type, confirm its approved answer and owner, and test a specific change. Agree what evidence to inspect and when to revisit open requests. Use the same definitions for the next sample. This research establishes no universal transfer count or completion target for your practice.
If you'd like to see how Hello Patient could handle incoming administrative questions and your clinical team's handoffs, schedule a demo. Bring de-identified call types, such as location questions. Use them to walk through what the agent could answer from approved information and what your team would receive next.
Frequently asked questions
How should an inbox audit count two threads about one patient request?
Count one request when both threads concern the same underlying question or task, and keep separate thread and contact counts. If a Hello Patient agent passes an incoming conversation to your team, your reviewers identify later contacts about that request. Give matched records one review ID inside an approved system. Keep individual contacts visible so another call or transfer does not disappear from the review. Set matching rules before you start, and mark uncertain matches as unknown. The agent's interaction log records the incoming conversation.
What should practice staff do when a message has no clear owner?
Use the practice's approved destination for unclear requests and its named fallback. A Hello Patient agent passes conversation context to the team your practice selects, so that destination needs an owner who can accept the handoff. Keep the request open until responsibility is settled. If the directory leaves that decision unclear, ask clinical and operations leads to assign the destination before using the new rule. Clinical leadership should approve the proposed request categories, owners, and escalation paths. Staff should follow the approved clinical review process whenever clinical content is present or uncertain.
Does a read receipt count as a resolved patient request?
A read receipt alone does not establish that a request was resolved. The practice checks whether the patient received an answer or the task was completed, and a Hello Patient agent's interaction log records what the patient was told. For a location question, completion might mean a record that the patient received the verified address. A scheduling request needs evidence of the permitted change. Agree those definitions before reviewing the sample. Keep unanswered parts of mixed requests open, and use “unknown” when the record cannot establish what happened.
How can a practice review messages without copying patient details into a shared worksheet?
Use request review IDs and process facts in a practice-approved worksheet, keeping patient details in approved systems. When a Hello Patient agent passes conversation context to your team, reviewers can examine that record where access is authorized and enter only the review fields they need. Those fields might include site, channel, transfers, and outcome status. Keep any link between the review ID and the source record in a restricted, approved location. Have your privacy or security lead approve the method and access. Our security guide covers related vendor questions.
Can a clinic's lower physician message count hide more work for nurses?
Yes, fewer physician messages can mean that nurses or MAs now handle more of those requests. Your review also counts the conversations a Hello Patient agent handles, so the work it takes on shows up too. Record who handled the request, missing information they collected, transfers, and repeat contacts. Include physician and administrative handling in the same sample so you can see where the work went. If you compare handling time, use a consistent method. Check whether the patient received an answer as well as who did the work.
How often should a practice check its routing directory?
Set a review interval your clinical and operations leads can maintain, and recheck affected entries when staffing, locations, policies, or services change. For incoming conversations handled by Hello Patient, confirm that the team your practice selected can receive the agent's handoff. Give each directory entry an owner and a last-checked date. Confirm the fallback when the usual owner is unavailable. Review open or misrouted requests after changing a rule, using a timeframe your practice agrees in advance. The research discussed here does not establish one review frequency for every practice.
.jpeg)